9/11 or 911, is it true that America has surrendered to the New world Oder?the pyramiad is God's eye. fooled?
It is old for me to know that it was every government in the world that planed this out, to do what?To brain wash poeple to take their rights away.Bush and the government, even the Illuminatis, that work behind the Vatican, the power behind the Anti Christ.It is all to take the rights away from the people of America to surrender to the Beast.The same beast that was behind the Holacaust, World War I and II, the killing of the Christians and Jews.This is all a plan that always failed in each age, the Catholic Church has always wanted this and their plan is rising and it will be settled for a short time.The Davici Code speaks of this but so many are ignorant and do not care about this. If you are a Christian, then you must know this. But, not all Christians are Christian, just like Israel, not all Israel is Jew.Every american president has known about this, president lincoln denied entering the illuminati, and for denying it they killed him. even kennedy, who was killed by the cia.
Government - 4 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Even scarier-- did you know a demon named Yog Shoggoth is imprisoned beneath the Pentagon? (think about it-- pentagon, pentagram) I am not sure if the flight that crahed into the pentagon released the demon or not, but there are strange doings a' happening...
2 :
you have gone too far
3 :
Not everyone wants to have civil rights taken away. Some people think they are safer if they are monitored. Other people think it is a violation of privacy and has nothing to do with protection against terrorism to monitor the lives of ordinary americans. Unfortunately many americans are very dense and can have the wool pulled over their eyes. These people are even so called educated. they believe everything they hear or read. One can even get them to vote for issues that directly hurt them. They are very ignorant. People do not know what is going on right under their noses when it is so easy to find out. There is a great deal of propiganda on the news, yet one can get real news. People are just not trying to get the real news. What criteria does yahoo answers use to censor?
4 :
Not all Christians are Christian ??? I guess not all Muslims are Muslims, and not all horses are horses. President Lincoln denied entering the illuminati ???? I don't blame him, I wouldn't enter any illuminati either, what ever that is. Kennedy was killed by the cia ???? By gosh, I'm learning something new every day. How come you know all this stuff that I don't know ?? America surrendered to the New world Oder ? Phewey, that's a stinky one. The pyramiad is God's eye. fooled? Hey, I wouldn't like it if I had a pyramiad in my eye, and I sure wouldn't fool around with it either. I don't know about those illuminatis working behind the Vatican. I wonder why they don't get some lights back there and chase them out. Where did you hear that anyone surrendered to the beast ? I thought he was killed in the bull fight arena. And all of this is based on the DaVinci Code, A made up story that has no historical meaning at all. Great!
Friday, August 21, 2009
Friday, August 14, 2009
Is the Pope a secret Buddhist
Is the Pope a secret Buddhist?
I work at the Vatican cleaning the place. The Pope has a closet the he keeps locked and I am not allowed to go into. I was cleaning his bathroom when I heard him come in a open it. Inside was a big Buddha statue. He made a offering of water and incense then he chanted in some weird language, and bowed to the statue. After that he sat crossed legged in front of it for a hour. I just creeped out. Is the Pope a secret Buddhist?!
Religion & Spirituality - 6 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Buddhists do not rape small children.
2 :
At his age better Buddhist than nudist.
3 :
There are many speculations about the identity of the Antichrist. One of the most frequent “victims†of the speculation is the pope of the Roman Catholic Church. In the days of the Protestant Reformation, Martin Luther and some of the other reformers were convinced that the pope of that time was the Antichrist. Pope John Paul II was commonly identified at the Antichrist until his death. The current pope, Benedict XVI, is an equally popular target. Why is this? Is there anything in the Bible that would indicate that a pope will be the Antichrist? The speculation about the pope possibly being the Antichrist revolves primarily around Revelation 17:9. Describing the evil end-times system symbolized by a woman riding a beast, Revelation 17:9 declares, “This calls for a mind with wisdom. The seven heads are seven hills on which the woman sits.†In ancient times, the city of Rome was known as “the city on seven hills†because there are seven prominent hills that surround the city. So, the thinking goes, we can know that it is somehow connected with Rome. So, if the evil end-times system is somehow connected to Rome – it does not take much thought to see a potential connection with the Roman Catholic Church, which is centered in Rome. Numerous passages in the Bible describe an “antichrist†who will lead the anti-Christ movement in the end times (Daniel 9:27; 2 Thessalonians 2:3-4; Revelation 13:5-8). So, if the end-times evil world system is centered in Rome, and led by an individual – the pope is a likely candidate. However, many other Bible commentators say the woman cannot be the Catholic Church and the seven hills cannot refer to Rome. They cite the fact that Revelation chapters 17-18 clearly identify her as the city of Babylon. (We know the city of Babylon by a different name today—Baghdad.) In addition, verse 10 clearly identifies the seven hills as symbolizing seven kings, five of which “have fallen, one is and one is to come.†Clearly this cannot refer to the seven hills of Rome. Rather, this is a reference to seven world empires ruled by the seven kings. At the time of the Revelation, five world empires had come and gone—Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Medo-Persia and Greece—one (Rome) existed, and one (Antichrist’s world empire) had not yet come. Whoever he turns out to be, the important thing is to be warned of his coming and learn to recognize not only the Antichrist, but all who possess his spirit. First John 4:2-3 tells us how to identify the spirit of Antichrist: "By this you know the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is of God, and every spirit that does not confess that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is not of God" (NKJV). The current pope, Benedict XVI, acknowledges Jesus as being from God and Jesus as coming in the flesh (see 1 John 4:2). While we disagree with Pope Benedict XVI on numerous areas of Catholic doctrine, his view of the Person of Jesus Christ is biblical. Therefore, it’s hard to believe that Pope Benedict XVI is the Antichrist. While we believe it is possible for a pope to be the Antichrist, the Bible does not give specific enough information to be dogmatic. A future pope very well may be the Antichrist, or perhaps the Antichrist’s false prophet (Revelation 13:11-17). If so, this future pope will be clearly identified by a denial of Jesus as coming in the flesh.
4 :
He's a secret charlatan, that's for sure.
5 :
Why are you telling lies about the Pope? You work in Vatican City? Yeah, right!
6 :
Right, you work at the vatican! Get lost troll.
I work at the Vatican cleaning the place. The Pope has a closet the he keeps locked and I am not allowed to go into. I was cleaning his bathroom when I heard him come in a open it. Inside was a big Buddha statue. He made a offering of water and incense then he chanted in some weird language, and bowed to the statue. After that he sat crossed legged in front of it for a hour. I just creeped out. Is the Pope a secret Buddhist?!
Religion & Spirituality - 6 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Buddhists do not rape small children.
2 :
At his age better Buddhist than nudist.
3 :
There are many speculations about the identity of the Antichrist. One of the most frequent “victims†of the speculation is the pope of the Roman Catholic Church. In the days of the Protestant Reformation, Martin Luther and some of the other reformers were convinced that the pope of that time was the Antichrist. Pope John Paul II was commonly identified at the Antichrist until his death. The current pope, Benedict XVI, is an equally popular target. Why is this? Is there anything in the Bible that would indicate that a pope will be the Antichrist? The speculation about the pope possibly being the Antichrist revolves primarily around Revelation 17:9. Describing the evil end-times system symbolized by a woman riding a beast, Revelation 17:9 declares, “This calls for a mind with wisdom. The seven heads are seven hills on which the woman sits.†In ancient times, the city of Rome was known as “the city on seven hills†because there are seven prominent hills that surround the city. So, the thinking goes, we can know that it is somehow connected with Rome. So, if the evil end-times system is somehow connected to Rome – it does not take much thought to see a potential connection with the Roman Catholic Church, which is centered in Rome. Numerous passages in the Bible describe an “antichrist†who will lead the anti-Christ movement in the end times (Daniel 9:27; 2 Thessalonians 2:3-4; Revelation 13:5-8). So, if the end-times evil world system is centered in Rome, and led by an individual – the pope is a likely candidate. However, many other Bible commentators say the woman cannot be the Catholic Church and the seven hills cannot refer to Rome. They cite the fact that Revelation chapters 17-18 clearly identify her as the city of Babylon. (We know the city of Babylon by a different name today—Baghdad.) In addition, verse 10 clearly identifies the seven hills as symbolizing seven kings, five of which “have fallen, one is and one is to come.†Clearly this cannot refer to the seven hills of Rome. Rather, this is a reference to seven world empires ruled by the seven kings. At the time of the Revelation, five world empires had come and gone—Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Medo-Persia and Greece—one (Rome) existed, and one (Antichrist’s world empire) had not yet come. Whoever he turns out to be, the important thing is to be warned of his coming and learn to recognize not only the Antichrist, but all who possess his spirit. First John 4:2-3 tells us how to identify the spirit of Antichrist: "By this you know the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is of God, and every spirit that does not confess that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is not of God" (NKJV). The current pope, Benedict XVI, acknowledges Jesus as being from God and Jesus as coming in the flesh (see 1 John 4:2). While we disagree with Pope Benedict XVI on numerous areas of Catholic doctrine, his view of the Person of Jesus Christ is biblical. Therefore, it’s hard to believe that Pope Benedict XVI is the Antichrist. While we believe it is possible for a pope to be the Antichrist, the Bible does not give specific enough information to be dogmatic. A future pope very well may be the Antichrist, or perhaps the Antichrist’s false prophet (Revelation 13:11-17). If so, this future pope will be clearly identified by a denial of Jesus as coming in the flesh.
4 :
He's a secret charlatan, that's for sure.
5 :
Why are you telling lies about the Pope? You work in Vatican City? Yeah, right!
6 :
Right, you work at the vatican! Get lost troll.
Friday, August 7, 2009
Has the Bible finally been discredited as a work of fiction
Has the Bible finally been discredited as a work of fiction?
The Vatican has decided to release a world shaking canon of Biblical texts tomorrow. The "Original" Epistles of the four recordists; the testaments according to Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, which have been housed in vaults in the Holy diocese, are to be made public as of 12pm tomorrow (19.01.2007). It has been independentally confirmed by scientists and Biblical scholars that these are the Alpha texts, unsullied by reproduction. However, the major controversy lies in the disclaimers present in each case on the first page of these ancient scrolls. It reads as follows: All characters are fictional. Any resemblance between them and actual events, entities, names or persons living or dead, is purely coincidental, and unintended by the author. The work has been copyrighted, as a work in progress at various times. All rights reserved. House of Zion Press. Is this the end of Christianity?
Religion & Spirituality - 23 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Discredited as a work of fiction would make it fact I think. Not my opinion, but thought I'd throw it in there. I'm the language Tsar... so I go around and discredit people by pointing out minor grammatical errors and make no points of my own about any topic. Nice muscles, by the way. Glenn Danzig? The Lion King?
2 :
no
3 :
Of course not. Don't be silly. No matter how much proof you've got, someone will always believe.
4 :
No science is proving more and more of the Bible to be true. Both the New and Old testaments.
5 :
The Satanic Bible has...yes! The Holy Bible is the book of life and is the manual on how to live. It is has been proved true.
6 :
blessed are those who have not seen and still believe. it is easy to be deceived by the devil and the ways of the world, but hard to find faith in what is the truth.
7 :
Lmao
8 :
WTF? Its one of the best works of fiction ever sold. What are you on about??
9 :
The Vatican? I do not take my information from the Vatican! Remember, the Catholics (the Vatican) has their own Bible. Why in the world would I listen to anything that comes out of Vatican City?
10 :
Do you mean ACcredited as a work of fiction? I've known that for thirty years.
11 :
Well that's only the catholic bible... After all, many different organizations have copyrights on different forms of the Bible, and none of them have such a statement.
12 :
Blasphemous!!!
13 :
wow thats really heavy stuff are you serious? if so you are right Christianity is a big joke.
14 :
LOL. Where did you get this? The "autographs" (which means original documents) have never been found.
15 :
No proof and don't make false accusations
16 :
Educate yourself and rid yourself of your ignorance. The Bible has been proven to be quite Historically accurate. Archeology is proving this more and more all the time.
17 :
i want to see where u are getting this from. i would not doubt this, but id just like to see it for myself. in my eyes, i dont think this started the downfall of christianity. i think it started loooooooooong ago.
18 :
This is just ridiculous. You are so funny. You should get a stand-up act.
19 :
Ancient philosophers got in great trouble for questioning if the Bible actually was a written document or something made up. They got put to death, thrown in captivety, but nothing to the extent of throwing off of a cliff like in ancient Mesoamerica. Questioning the Bible would just end up as simply saying that the Bible is a work of nonfiction!
20 :
Are you fluent in ancient Greek?
21 :
what does the catholic church hace to do wit Christianity. they deny the diety of Jesus Christ and His role as intersessorbetween man and God? They even use there own "adjusted" bible. The Christian Bible still remains the true, inerrant Word of the Living God Jehovah.
22 :
The Catholics have always had a different canon and used different books. Nothing the Catholics do much matters in the grand scheme of things.
23 :
Hahahaahahahhaahahahahhaahhaahhaahhahaahah you made my day Thanks I hope this is true. Although I don't think it will make any difference though. They will probably "alter" it again by ripping out this page
24 :
Oh if only we would go away that easy, eh? Christianity will end when Christ returns.
The Vatican has decided to release a world shaking canon of Biblical texts tomorrow. The "Original" Epistles of the four recordists; the testaments according to Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, which have been housed in vaults in the Holy diocese, are to be made public as of 12pm tomorrow (19.01.2007). It has been independentally confirmed by scientists and Biblical scholars that these are the Alpha texts, unsullied by reproduction. However, the major controversy lies in the disclaimers present in each case on the first page of these ancient scrolls. It reads as follows: All characters are fictional. Any resemblance between them and actual events, entities, names or persons living or dead, is purely coincidental, and unintended by the author. The work has been copyrighted, as a work in progress at various times. All rights reserved. House of Zion Press. Is this the end of Christianity?
Religion & Spirituality - 23 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Discredited as a work of fiction would make it fact I think. Not my opinion, but thought I'd throw it in there. I'm the language Tsar... so I go around and discredit people by pointing out minor grammatical errors and make no points of my own about any topic. Nice muscles, by the way. Glenn Danzig? The Lion King?
2 :
no
3 :
Of course not. Don't be silly. No matter how much proof you've got, someone will always believe.
4 :
No science is proving more and more of the Bible to be true. Both the New and Old testaments.
5 :
The Satanic Bible has...yes! The Holy Bible is the book of life and is the manual on how to live. It is has been proved true.
6 :
blessed are those who have not seen and still believe. it is easy to be deceived by the devil and the ways of the world, but hard to find faith in what is the truth.
7 :
Lmao
8 :
WTF? Its one of the best works of fiction ever sold. What are you on about??
9 :
The Vatican? I do not take my information from the Vatican! Remember, the Catholics (the Vatican) has their own Bible. Why in the world would I listen to anything that comes out of Vatican City?
10 :
Do you mean ACcredited as a work of fiction? I've known that for thirty years.
11 :
Well that's only the catholic bible... After all, many different organizations have copyrights on different forms of the Bible, and none of them have such a statement.
12 :
Blasphemous!!!
13 :
wow thats really heavy stuff are you serious? if so you are right Christianity is a big joke.
14 :
LOL. Where did you get this? The "autographs" (which means original documents) have never been found.
15 :
No proof and don't make false accusations
16 :
Educate yourself and rid yourself of your ignorance. The Bible has been proven to be quite Historically accurate. Archeology is proving this more and more all the time.
17 :
i want to see where u are getting this from. i would not doubt this, but id just like to see it for myself. in my eyes, i dont think this started the downfall of christianity. i think it started loooooooooong ago.
18 :
This is just ridiculous. You are so funny. You should get a stand-up act.
19 :
Ancient philosophers got in great trouble for questioning if the Bible actually was a written document or something made up. They got put to death, thrown in captivety, but nothing to the extent of throwing off of a cliff like in ancient Mesoamerica. Questioning the Bible would just end up as simply saying that the Bible is a work of nonfiction!
20 :
Are you fluent in ancient Greek?
21 :
what does the catholic church hace to do wit Christianity. they deny the diety of Jesus Christ and His role as intersessorbetween man and God? They even use there own "adjusted" bible. The Christian Bible still remains the true, inerrant Word of the Living God Jehovah.
22 :
The Catholics have always had a different canon and used different books. Nothing the Catholics do much matters in the grand scheme of things.
23 :
Hahahaahahahhaahahahahhaahhaahhaahhahaahah you made my day Thanks I hope this is true. Although I don't think it will make any difference though. They will probably "alter" it again by ripping out this page
24 :
Oh if only we would go away that easy, eh? Christianity will end when Christ returns.
Saturday, August 1, 2009
Will Rosetta Stone Latin work
Will Rosetta Stone Latin work?
I decided I want to learn Latin over the summer, for the purpose of better understanding scientific names and many words in English and all of the romance languages. I was going to buy the Rosetta Stone Latin software, but some of the reviews say that it's the ancient roman kind of latin, and not the kind they speak in the vatican or something. So my question is, do scientific names and things incorporate the ancient roman latin that rosetta stone covers, or some other kind of latin? is there a big difference between the two? Thanks.
Languages - 2 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
The scientific names for things are all based on Classical (ancient) Latin. However, the way we SAY those words is closer to the Vatican pronunciation. There's not a big difference between the two, but Classical Latin used the letter 'v' where today we use both 'u' and 'v', and it used 'i' where we use both 'j' and 'i'. You can tell those letters are related because they look so much alike. In Classical Latin, you'd have a word like 'iustitia', meaning "justice" and pronounced with a Y sound for the first 'i' and a sound like EE as in "bee" for the second two i's. I think in the Vatican they spell that word with a 'j' these days. And the word for "truth" was 'vervm' and was pronounced with a W sound at the start and an OO sound as in "boot" for the second 'v'. Today in the Vatican it's probably probably spelled 'verum' and pronounced like you'd expect, with an English V sound at the start. If you learn it with Rosetta Stone, it'll be easy enough to understand either version. You should be warned, however, that Rosetta Stone probably isn't worth the $$ it costs. Just for the Latin level 1 disk, it's 160 bucks. Here in California it'd cost less to take a class at community college, and you'd learn a lot more.
2 :
The fact of the matter enhancing ones linguistic skills is a vastly exhaustive endeavor. One lingual factor (such as speaking) cannot strengthened while ignoring the other aspects. All dimensions must be covered. One must be fully motivated. Language learning must be made fun to evade discouragement. Start with supplies from your library and take some classes if possible. Lessons are vital , but as are these: 1) Listening/watching: Keep listening to radio stations as well as watching TV shows in the target language. (Subtitles are crucial here) 2) Writing/reading/communication: Discover discussion forums on things that you find interesting and FUN (music/various artists, hobbies, etc.) and start communicating there with other people using only the target language. Start using instant messaging systems in case you find some new friends or start emailing them. Do NOT fear making mistakes or hesitating, because even native speakers do make mistakes and do hesitate at times! The more enjoyable the experience, the more proneness to success. 3) Purchase a bilingual dictionary with your native language and the target language. Upon encountering a new word, search it up in the dictionary. Placing words in their context is one of the greatest antics to increase one's vocabulary and grammar knowledge. The more skillful in reading and writing also, the better. Memorizing in itself isn't the best way to go with learning vocabulary, grammar or any other language brackets! For idioms, you should buy a dictionary which explains the words and shows you examples of how to use the words. The most crucial point is to make it as fun as possible for yourself. Try to locate interesting topics. Read online newspapers, listen radio stations online, if you find a discussion forum for e.g. your favorite hobby or your idols in music do participate there, etc. The essential word here is context, which indicates that it is simpler to learn new words and their usage as well as grammar when you use/see them in their real context . The more frequent you see and hear the new words in their context and the more you use them in your speech & writing, the easier it becomes to remember their meanings and correct spelling. Although don't fear making flaws since native speakers do make mistakes at points. I apologize, but there isn't an easy method. Mastery of a foreign language in short time span (such as 6 months) is neigh on impossible. Any language is challenging unless you grew up speaking it. Finally but not least: Never ever use online translators. They are inaccurate and useless. Do refrain from overrated, overpriced language gimmicks such as Rosetta Stone. Good luck!
I decided I want to learn Latin over the summer, for the purpose of better understanding scientific names and many words in English and all of the romance languages. I was going to buy the Rosetta Stone Latin software, but some of the reviews say that it's the ancient roman kind of latin, and not the kind they speak in the vatican or something. So my question is, do scientific names and things incorporate the ancient roman latin that rosetta stone covers, or some other kind of latin? is there a big difference between the two? Thanks.
Languages - 2 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
The scientific names for things are all based on Classical (ancient) Latin. However, the way we SAY those words is closer to the Vatican pronunciation. There's not a big difference between the two, but Classical Latin used the letter 'v' where today we use both 'u' and 'v', and it used 'i' where we use both 'j' and 'i'. You can tell those letters are related because they look so much alike. In Classical Latin, you'd have a word like 'iustitia', meaning "justice" and pronounced with a Y sound for the first 'i' and a sound like EE as in "bee" for the second two i's. I think in the Vatican they spell that word with a 'j' these days. And the word for "truth" was 'vervm' and was pronounced with a W sound at the start and an OO sound as in "boot" for the second 'v'. Today in the Vatican it's probably probably spelled 'verum' and pronounced like you'd expect, with an English V sound at the start. If you learn it with Rosetta Stone, it'll be easy enough to understand either version. You should be warned, however, that Rosetta Stone probably isn't worth the $$ it costs. Just for the Latin level 1 disk, it's 160 bucks. Here in California it'd cost less to take a class at community college, and you'd learn a lot more.
2 :
The fact of the matter enhancing ones linguistic skills is a vastly exhaustive endeavor. One lingual factor (such as speaking) cannot strengthened while ignoring the other aspects. All dimensions must be covered. One must be fully motivated. Language learning must be made fun to evade discouragement. Start with supplies from your library and take some classes if possible. Lessons are vital , but as are these: 1) Listening/watching: Keep listening to radio stations as well as watching TV shows in the target language. (Subtitles are crucial here) 2) Writing/reading/communication: Discover discussion forums on things that you find interesting and FUN (music/various artists, hobbies, etc.) and start communicating there with other people using only the target language. Start using instant messaging systems in case you find some new friends or start emailing them. Do NOT fear making mistakes or hesitating, because even native speakers do make mistakes and do hesitate at times! The more enjoyable the experience, the more proneness to success. 3) Purchase a bilingual dictionary with your native language and the target language. Upon encountering a new word, search it up in the dictionary. Placing words in their context is one of the greatest antics to increase one's vocabulary and grammar knowledge. The more skillful in reading and writing also, the better. Memorizing in itself isn't the best way to go with learning vocabulary, grammar or any other language brackets! For idioms, you should buy a dictionary which explains the words and shows you examples of how to use the words. The most crucial point is to make it as fun as possible for yourself. Try to locate interesting topics. Read online newspapers, listen radio stations online, if you find a discussion forum for e.g. your favorite hobby or your idols in music do participate there, etc. The essential word here is context, which indicates that it is simpler to learn new words and their usage as well as grammar when you use/see them in their real context . The more frequent you see and hear the new words in their context and the more you use them in your speech & writing, the easier it becomes to remember their meanings and correct spelling. Although don't fear making flaws since native speakers do make mistakes at points. I apologize, but there isn't an easy method. Mastery of a foreign language in short time span (such as 6 months) is neigh on impossible. Any language is challenging unless you grew up speaking it. Finally but not least: Never ever use online translators. They are inaccurate and useless. Do refrain from overrated, overpriced language gimmicks such as Rosetta Stone. Good luck!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)