Wednesday, July 7, 2010

To Creationist Christians; What do you think of Christians that accepts evolution

To Creationist Christians; What do you think of Christians that accepts evolution?
And how do you reply to the fact that nearly all scientists accept evolution? What about the Jesuit Scientist that works in the Vatican Observatory ( http://www.pbs.org/faithandreason/transcript/coyne-frame.html ) ? Does that not prove something? Do you take into account that Genesis was written in a vastly different time, and that it was not meant to be a scientific journal, but a book of faith? What is there to suggest that the people who wrote it could simply not have being trying to tell fundamental religious truths using the knowledge of the time? Also, Are you Catholic, Orthodox or Protestant? Excuse me, But I think that there are plenty of religious people that accept evolution. Heck, I think even the Pope accepts it! Unless you are one of those loonies saying that we Catholics aren't Christians. At least we didn't remove the Books of the Bible trying to prove our own spin of Jesus's messagecorrectt, Like Martin Luther who created the Version of the Bible that Protestants follow.
Religion & Spirituality - 8 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
That they call God a liar - and grieve the Holy Spirit 1Ti 6:20 ¶ O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane [and] vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: 1Ti 6:21 Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace [be] with thee. Amen. ======== Num 23:19 God [is] not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do [it]? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good?
2 :
Many Christians accept it, although they invent an imaginary barrier between micro and macro. They are only terms used to differentiate, it's just evolution, which shows a God is not required.
3 :
They are not Christians! Evolution is a religion and you can not be both!
4 :
The vast majority of scientists who accept evolution atheists. There are many scientist who don't accept it. What i think of christians who accepts evolution is they are calling God a liar.
5 :
Basically, if you don't believe 100% everything I do, you're going to hell. /sarcasm, for me, but most of them believe that
6 :
>What do you think of Christians that accepts evolution? I think they're compromising. In the 70s, many scientists believed a second ice age was going to occur in the next 30 years, now that we "know" global warming is going to destroy the earth it appears scientists are fallible.
7 :
Evolution is inconsistent with both the scriptures and science. Those that don't understand God's Word try to force fit evolution into the Bible by misinterprepting the scriptures.
8 :
John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2He was in the beginning with God. 3All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made. Jesus says here that He made everything. Evolution is false, God created everything. If you cannot accept that God created everything than how can you believe in God? Romans 1:18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who by their unrighteousness suppress the truth. When you suppress the truth from God he will pour His wrath out on you. Catholics really do not accept the truths in the Bible, they love to follow mans doctrines instead of God and this proves it. You need to repent and turn to God before its too late and you miss out entering into heaven.

Thursday, July 1, 2010

Why are the principles of Roman Catholic social teaching morally binding on all people and not just Roman C

7.Why are the principles of Roman Catholic social teaching morally binding on all people and not just Roman C?
7.Why are the principles of Roman Catholic social teaching morally binding on all people and not just Roman Catholics? 8.How does the Second Vatican Council’s Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World and the United States Catholic bishops’ Economic Justice for All link faith with business? 9.For what three reasons does CST maintain that human work has an inherent dignity? What specific implications does this teaching have for American corporations?
Religion & Spirituality - 5 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Probably because it all started with Catholicism.
2 :
because the Vatican says so? does this social teaching also respect the rights of religious freedom as guaranteed in the US Constitution? Rerum Novarum etc. promises many rights, but what about that one? Get out of our government. Such imperialistic aggressiveness is undoing all pretenses to "interfaith dialogue" essayed during the last decades. We are not dhimmis to be extorted by neofeudal fascists. Robert C you are sorely mistaken.
3 :
7. Truth binds us all. We all have consciences. The Vatican offers these teachings as advice to the rest of the World - they believe they should follow them because they believe in their hearts they recognise them as true. 8. Am not qualified to answer. Have never heard of the "United States Catholic bishops’ Economic Justice for All" thing (Je suis Anglais) 9. Ditto
4 :
whether one likes it or not ,when the catholic church gives a ruling regarding "faith and morals " nothing else , all christians are bound by it., and some protestant pastors actually try and follow them
5 :
Here is some background so that you can research your own answers. The seven major themes of Catholic Social Teaching are: • Life and Dignity of the Human Person • Call to Family, Community, and Participation • Rights and Responsibilities • Option for the Poor and Vulnerable • The Dignity of Work and the Rights of Workers • Solidarity • Care for God's Creation For more information, see: http://www.usccb.org/sdwp/projects/socialteaching/socialteaching.htm#intro Here is a short list of Papal and Vatican Documents on Catholic Social Teaching: • Rerum Novarum (On the Condition of Labor) -- Pope Leo XIII, 1891 http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/leo_xiii/encyclicals/documents/hf_l-xiii_enc_15051891_rerum-novarum_en.html • Mater et Magistra (Christianity and Social Progress) -- Pope John XXIII, 1961 http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_xxiii/encyclicals/documents/hf_j-xxiii_enc_15051961_mater_en.html • Gaudium et Spes (Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World) Vatican Council II, 1965 http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_cons_19651207_gaudium-et-spes_en.html • Laborem Exercens (On Human Work) -- Pope John Paul II, 1981 http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_14091981_laborem-exercens_en.html • Sollicitudo Rei Socialis (On Social Concern) -- Pope John Paul II, 1987 http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_30121987_sollicitudo-rei-socialis_en.html • Evangelium Vitae (The Gospel of Life) -- Pope John Paul II, 1995 http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_25031995_evangelium-vitae_en.html • Deus Caritas Est (God Is Love) -- Pope Benedict XVI, 2005 http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/encyclicals/documents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20051225_deus-caritas-est_en.html • Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church - Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, 2004 http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/justpeace/documents/rc_pc_justpeace_doc_20060526_compendio-dott-soc_en.html • With love in Christ.

Monday, June 21, 2010

Wanted to ask a lawyer this religious question, The Vatican is not a true state so no immunity for the Pope

Wanted to ask a lawyer this religious question, The Vatican is not a true state so no immunity for the Pope?
But no money or cards. That question as well as the below info. Can I get the right answer here for free? Please! Fraud protection against counterfeit religion and religious leaders who are secular not spiritual in truth! Can the nations give universal power to the United Nations to tax fraud secular religion? A religious head & universal jurisdiction and the Pope's immunity could [it] be challenged in Britain? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100404/ap_on_re_eu/eu_britain_pope If religion has become secular for the love of money it is a counterfeit religion making Jesus Father's house a business therefore taxable! (See John 2:16) Universal jurisdiction law by the United Nations can be given power to give no immunity from taxing those religions that are in the love of money business over love of God and neighbor! All governments can use that needed income! Where is a genuine religion today? "When the Son of man cometh, shall he find [true] faith on the earth?" (Luke 18:8) See Matthew 6:24 also, one or the other takes top place! The Vatican is not a true state so no immunity for the Pope, true? A Lawyer wants to answer your question Tina Lawyer Hi, JustAnswer is asking me to answer your question -- "Fraud protection against counterfeit religion and religious" -- because it falls within my area of expertise. Please select a price you are willing to pay and I will get to work! https://secure.justanswer.com/payment/deposit-funds.aspx?opt=10&tqid=45866031 The Vatican is a sovereign state. Vatican City is an independent country. Jesus has not set up a sovereign state or independent country only a theocratic Christian congregation and is to be no part of the human government system so it is a counterfeit Christian theocracy independent country sovereign state by human law not by God's law! Therefore, The Vatican is not a true state so no immunity for the Pope, true? It is a counterfeit county state not by divine rule of God! So taxable because it is a business acting as if a religion! A apostate religion business who left the true faith!
Religion & Spirituality - 3 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Vatican City is an independent country. The rest of your question is gibberish.
2 :
I'm afraid all religion will soon be taxed.
3 :
The Vatican is a sovereign state. The rest of your "question" is, indeed, gibberish.